Blog
The thinking behind the system — long-form pieces on what it takes to understand land at depth, plus the data and methods behind the Land Health System.
Regenerative, agroecological, organic, biodynamic, nature-based, conservation, restorative, rewilding. Nature-positive, carbon-positive farming goes by many names. This is the one thing they all share: the power of helping every practitioner understand their land better.
In March 2026 England published its first Land Use Framework. It is not a law you comply with. It is a strategy that changes how land decisions get made and where public money flows. Here is what it is, what it is not, and why it matters even though it is not mandatory.
The EU's big sustainability law won't land on most farms directly, but it reaches them anyway, through the value chain. Here is exactly how CSRD touches farming, who is really in scope, and the one change that works in a farm's favour.
A single carbon number is a hypothesis. EcoIntel cross-checks every parcel's pipeline estimate against fourteen authoritative public reference datasets and publishes the disagreements. Here is what the references are, why each is in the panel, and what the whole arrangement is for.
EcoIntel is an ADP (Assessment, Diagnostics, Practical guidance), not an MRV. The two answer different questions, serve different audiences, and work best together. Here is exactly what we do that MRV typically does not, and how the two systems fit.
The gap that has not closed despite the knowledge being there is not a gap of intent or information. It is the gap between general knowledge and specific ground. Closing it is what EcoIntel was built for.
Why soil carbon, species counts and carbon flux can't tell you if your land is improving. And how four leading indicators do. The diagnostic logic behind EcoIntel's Land Health Score.
